No.
10 -- Your team or corporate environment is experiencing interpersonal
conflict.
Many managers mistake this sign as a warning to look out for
break room brawls or on-the-road-sales-call spats. Would be
nice if it were that clear of a symptom. Actually, most corporate
conflict occurs in a passive-aggressive-oriented manner due
to the cost-benefit ratio that is perceived by most to favor
keeping everything cool and status quo. The result? Withdrawal,
implicit agreement with head nods yet under the breath sighs
and actual behavioral compliance, and other creative ways
to simply plateau peacefully. As quoted in the bestseller
Crucial Confrontations (Patterson, Grenny, McMillan, &
Switzler, 2005, p. 17), a national poll of U.S. workers found
that 44 percent reported putting in as little effort as they
could get away with without being fired. If this speaks of
human nature innately, as it is, nothing gives this statistic
more fire to increase in percentage points as emotional or
interpersonal conflict. Too bad that you won't see it so directly—till
later when "numbers come out." And sometimes it
is too late.
If you suspect sub-optimal performance, an executive coach
can use interviewing skills and assessments to get at core
issues quickly and efficiently and most importantly as an
unbiased outsider.
No. 9 -- Sudden/unexplained "shift"
or change in a crucial business indicator of success, specific
to a particular industry.
Many times the human performance element is too subtle for
the keenest of managers and one is left with pure outcomes
to tell the story. I have worked with executives that have
hired me with the question "Doc, something is odd....
Our numbers are down in this division, and it is a change
from the norm. I don't get it. Those guys are great players
for us." Executive coaches look for both the individual
parameters (motivation, skill, confidence, knowledge gaps)
that could have changed, as well as systemic, environmental
processes that may not have had optimal communication channels
in place to support the stellar talent within, and the most
common culprit, the combination of both.
Executive coaches in these instances make sure they leave
the client with performance enhancement tools as well as ways
to increase feedback systems.
No. 8 – Decreased emphasis on
preserving human capital
This is a difficult one to swallow and typically is couched
within budget reasons. Given the excuse typically given out,
it is a hard one used to justify calling in an executive coach,
the Cadillac of human capital investment strategies. However,
an executive coach will sometimes enter with one of the other
Top Ten reasons cited here but will ultimately have this difficult
discussion with the CEO. That is, that there are no personal
flaws of a significant nature with his/her employees, but
rather an insensitivity to the motivational systems that refill
an "empty tank" and produce what Covey calls the
8th habit of success—personal fulfillment, the most desired
aspect in a work environment. This characteristic is only
attained with an investment in ways to engage workers significantly
and give them the opportunity to feel alive. No one stops
being fully human between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. Monday to Friday.
I ran across a quote I fell in love with the other day. It
said, "Don't ask yourself what the world needs from you.
Ask yourself what makes you come alive and go do that. For
the world needs more people that have come alive." It
is hard for us to do this if our paid job doesn't increase
the probability of our making this more likely.
No. 7 -- Oversimplification of strategy
To the man with a hammer, the world is a nail. Too bad the
business world doesn't need more hammers. In fact, it is full
of rich textured strategies to gain success. In my opinion,
I don't believe anyone has done a meta-analysis of the factors
needed for organizational excellence. Nope, no empiricism.
Instead tons of "7 steps to..." and "7 habits
for..." What is it about this number 7? Seems to belong
more in the Bible then in a board room, but I digress...
In my years of studying human nature in performance realms,
I have yet to be granted such a divine revelatory experience
that would lead me to such hubris of declaring the finite
nature of tips, tools, or strategies that I could apply everywhere.
Now, I can either see myself as inexperienced and incompetent,
but my results with CEO's and their companies do not show
that. Instead, I believe My Approach with people is more of
a personification of the paradoxical nature of truth. That
is, the more I acknowledge individual differences and see
the sense in human choice, the more truth of performance emerges
naturally.
In my work as an executive coach I have seen many leaders
fall victim to idolatry, hailing the God of their strategy
at the expense of seeing their colleagues and direct reports
as co-holders of the truth. Even if one does not believe that
ultimately this is true, your choices our limited to get to
the truth; one must engage those around you.
No. 6 -- Isolation and withdrawal
Though many executives have busy travel schedules and unique
personality differences that would predispose some to not
be as present as others do in the workplace, one needs to
watch out for these variables. I have seen many professionals
take the slippery slope down to failure, making daily if not
moment by moment choices to avoid conflict and "check
out." This disassociated strategy attempts to achieve
an illusory equilibrium within them, for they see their challenges,
whether personal or professional, as too daunting to mount.
As with any other human being, the path of "temporary"
least resistance is chosen leading us to make the outcome
far worse than it could of been if we had chosen openness
and honesty in our communications.
As an executive coach, I have seen my clients countless times
take the risk to share some rather wrenching and/or potentially
damaging comments to colleagues, only to experience the resiliency
of human nature. Many times, the people around him/her already
knew what was going on and waited for him/her to “fess
up”. Integrity is preserved and respect gained. And
these attributes are invaluable to a leader.
No. 5 -- Increase in turnover, absenteeism
and tardiness
Well, sometimes as an executive coach, I get handed a gold
nugget--the kind that doesn't make me go on a Columbo-like
search throughout a company to see the root cause. It simply
is written on the wall. However, you would be surprised how
few executives see reality as it is. In a personal conversation
with the world's expert on employee retention, Leigh Branham
told me that he recently looked at 4,000 exit surveys from
the Saratoga Institute to glean data as to why employees leave.
Interesting finding, 89% of managers think they leave for
promotion, pay, or status increase, while 89% of employees
actually leave for "disengagement" reasons with
critical individuals at work. Do you see the self-serving
perceptual bias at work?
Executive coaches work with managers to get them to see reality.
This is only difficult if we use confrontation as the primary
door "in." However, if we match the manager where
he/she is at in their perception of their employees who leave
and gently guide them to any pattern, that will always be
greater than any single "data point."
No. 4 -- Performance quotas missed
I once heard a story of a European manager talking to an executive
coach about his befuddling experience in why his team was
6 months into the fiscal year and way behind in reaching their
sales quota. The coach asked him what it would take to close
the gap between current performance and desired performance,
signifying the successful outcome of what his team was committed
to accomplish. He said approximately 2 million pounds. The
coach had to rephrase the question, for it was evident that
the manager did not understand the significance of the question.
The coach restated it as, "What have your team members
personally committed to in accomplishing in sales this year?"
After a few moments of silence, the manager said, "I
have never asked them that." Though this story may seem
so simplistic, you would be surprised how many managers assume
commitment based on the appeal of the commissions, with no
regard to obtaining the optimal idiosyncratic way of motivating
each worker with the ultimate goal of aligning personal commitments
to the organization' s goal.
Executive coaches work with managers to change their "telling"
relationship into a more coaching-oriented one where their
direct reports naturally thrive and enjoy accountability and
success on their own.
No. 3 -- Complacency among managers
- "The Fine Syndrome"
This important sign for an executive coach to get on board
is sometimes missed by senior executives for the "all
is fine" response satisfies executives in many instances.
That is, many executives see crucial confrontations as a "bother"
and reserved more for Titanic-proportion problems. By then,
it is simply too late and the executive uses power and insight
maladroitly to add insult on top of injury. Though senior
level management is trained to look for performance indicators
and bottom line-type inquiries, they sometimes forget the
process-oriented pieces that are essential in getting outcomes.
When a manager consistently responds with "fine"
on many issues, they are usually lazy in some regard and have
chosen some shortcuts that have redefined success as "the
absence of problems."
Many philosophers, business consultants, and coaches would
agree that the absence of evil is not equated to the presence
of good or excellence. So don't settle for verbal confirmations
that are equivalent to "we are breathing oxygen, so we
are fine."
No. 2 -- The Insanity Definition: Doing
the same thing over and over and expecting different results.
This sign is the center of countless bureaucratic meetings
where individuals become experts in describing the water while
someone is drowning. Business publications don't help this
problem for they seem to come out with new terminology that
can really hide the fact that a company is really in essence
doing the same type of approach to a problem over and over
and over again. As long as one talks "optimizing a business
model" or "best practice" it's got to be good,
right? An executive coach never loses sight of inquiry as
a tool. I sometimes will dig for multiple levels of explanation
to see how well my client really knows the issue at hand,
for it takes a layer or two usually to get past the linguistic
illusions. But it is not just business people who get caught
in this.
I was boarding a plane for business travel and the ticket
agent was asking everyone to comply with the "boarding
process." Why "process"? Isn't this unnecessary?
Aren't we just being asked to follow the rules to boarding
the plane?
No. 1 sign that you might need an executive
coach...You say you don't need one!
Isn't it true that when we think we have it figured out that
is when we get it right between the eyes? This sign is reserved
for the CEO who does most of the visionary assessments for
how they and the company are doing. The powerful, all-knowing,
narcissistic leader typically doesn't call in an executive
coach. Yet it is these types of leaders who really need one,
but are lost in the "bell curve" where their myopic
approach to getting results is temporarily rewarding them.
However, if you are a VP or an executive team member for someone
like this, executive coaching could really be a powerful,
confidential resource to making sure your success is ever-lasting
and not a tool for your CEO's ill-fitted ways of validating
his own success.
Shall we talk?
|